You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Paying our bills, and extras”.
Paying our bills, and extras
by Nancy Oates on June 12, 2017
• Permalink
Tagged pay raise
Posted by Nancy Oates on June 12, 2017
http://chapelhillwatch.com/2017/06/12/paying-our-bills-and-extras/
Previous Post
Building community
Building community
Next Post
Fitting in our dreams
Fitting in our dreams
Recent Comments
- Nancy Oates on We’re still here
- Deborah Fulghieri on We’re still here
- Pluramus on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- Plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
- Plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
Blogroll
Categories
- 140 West
- Budget
- Business
- Carolina North
- CH2020
- Committees
- Community life
- Council Members
- County business
- Courts
- Courtyards of Homestead
- COVID-19
- Deer
- Downtown Chapel Hill
- Economic development
- Elections
- Environment
- Ethics
- Food Trucks
- Homeless Shelter
- Housing
- Land Use
- Library
- Lifestyle
- Media
- Museum
- Northside
- Occupy Protests
- Parking
- Police
- Politics
- Public Works
- Roads
- Sanitation workers
- Schools
- Social justice
- Spending
- Taxes
- Technology
- Town staff
- Transportation
- Trees
- UNC
- Uncategorized
- Work and Money
Tag Cloud
123 West Franklin advisory boards affordability American Legion annexation Bicycle Apartments bond referendum BRT Bus ads candidates Carolina Flats cell phones Central West CH2020 Charterwood Community Home Trust comprehensive plan county commissioners county government development Ephesus-Fordham fireworks form-based zoning Franklin Street Friends of Downtown Growth health care Historic District Commission historic districts Holidays Light Rail Obey Creek park-and-ride personalities real estate sales Rogers Road Shortbread Silent Sam students The Edge Timber Hollow towing traffic Trinitas VOEMeta
Terri
/ June 12, 2017I served on the OWASA board for 6 years and for 5 of those years I argued that a flat rate for employee performance increases was the most democratic approach. At the common 2% award, someone earning $100K a year, would get a $2,000 annual salary increase. Someone earning $35K would get $700. Another way to look at this is that 3 employees at the lower salary rate earn the same as 1 employee at the higher rate. We could have paid a $1,500 flat rate to everyone for the same budget as we paid the percentage rate. But even that slightly less increase was enough to cause the traditionalist to claim injustice for the higher income workers.
Is good performance really dependent on original salary or is good performance good performance? I believe it should rewarded equitably.
The first couple of years, I argued alone but slowly others began to join me. We never reached a majority but came very close. I hope at least a couple of those board members who are still serving will continue the fight for economic justice.
Bonnie Hauser
/ June 12, 2017There are broader questions – one is whether people are being paid competitively – and does their salary keep up with inflation.
The rewards for public service jobs are not money – but people deserve to be paid for their contribution and experience. Salary compression can create serious problems for morale.
IMO, the wealth gap is not between people making $150,000 or $40,000. Its people making millions on the backs of low wage employees. That’s not a problem here.
Here’s UNC’s comparison of county salaries 2017. Is there a similar benchmark for towns?
https://www.sog.unc.edu/publications/reports/county-salaries-north-carolina-2017
plurimus
/ June 13, 2017First, there is a “market rate” for most jobs. Raises should not go on forever in the same job unless market forces drive it up. Promotions should increase salary with responsibility. Salary should also be considered in the context of other benefits and perks such as heath care, savings/investment matches and education reimbursement. Total compensation is the yardstick.
Second, salary is not for rewarding performance bonus payments are. Bonus should be reward for above and beyond commitment and accomplishment in a given fiscal year and in my opinion be team based.
As far as CEO and executive pay Bonnie is bang on. The amounts paid to Execs while simultaneously giving them government funded welfare such as deferred income, reduced taxes on options, indemnifying them legally from questionable decisions and other financial candy is disgraceful and harmful to our society at every level.
Third democratic approaches do not work. It isn’t a popularity contest. Corporations are not democracies, trying to run them as such shows a lack of adequate ownership and leadership.