Children left behind

Why set kids up to fail? For that matter, why load up their parents and teachers with guilt?

Not everyone is capable of shining academically. On a bell curve of IQ, there are just as many people to the left of the apex as to the right. Extraordinary nurture can elicit amazing results with unremarkable nature, just as extraordinary nature can go to waste without adequate nurture. Add to that individual personality and motivation, and no one can predict who’s going to reach great heights and who will sink to eye-averting lows. But we can be sure that not everyone will succeed along the same academic track.

This year, the well-intentioned No Child Left Behind law ratcheted up to a new level. Only four of 19 schools in the renowned Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system met the standards. That reflects less on the quality of our schools than it does on the unrealistic expectations of NCLB. And schools that don’t meet the higher standards year after year risk funding cuts or being closed altogether. States can opt out of NCLB only if they give up that federal funding.

The theory behind NCLB, proposed a decade ago and signed into law in 2002 by then-President George W. Bush, was that if you set high expectations for students and teachers, they will meet them. The sanctions for not meeting the goals pushed some school systems to peg teachers’ bonuses on whether their students passed the annual assessments. Students who struggled with retaining information long enough to pass tests or whose thought processes led them to different conclusions than the standardized tests did failed.

High school is tough because students are pressured to excel at everything. And none of us do. Just because someone is incapable of meeting traditional academic standards, doesn’t mean they can’t succeed elsewhere. Give students alternate paths that allow them to flourish in the areas in which they are competent. Holding on to those high expectations for a student who can’t meet them is the surest way to leave that child behind.
– Nancy Oates

School board matters (corrected)

Candidates for school board get far less attention than the mayoral and town council races. Yes, yes, providing quality education to the next generation, those who will be in charge of generating revenue to fund your dotage, is important to all of us, whether or not we have children. But the decisions the school board makes could directly affect your wealth.

We’d like to think, perhaps, that people want to move to Chapel Hill because of our independently owned restaurants or our art galleries or our soon-to-be-fancy library. But what motivates many people to spend $400,000-plus for a house in Chapel Hill is the reputation of our schools. Chapel Hill-Carrboro schools consistently show a higher percentage of students achieving proficiency at or above grade level on state end-of-course exams than the state average and Durham public schools. Chapel Hill-Carrboro schools also record higher graduation rates than either the state average or Durham schools.

Good schools keep our property values high and in demand, even when homes outside town limits where property taxes are lower are selling for less. Parents with high-paying jobs and high expectations for their children’s success flock to our district, filling the schools with students who are genetically loaded for brains and create peer pressure to do well.

But the school system has navigated budget cuts that require the board to make tough choices. And more choppy waters are ahead. Parents have filed suit over allegations of bullying at Phillips Middle School. New No Child Left Behind standards kicked in this year, and only four schools in our system met the mark. The achievement gap between white and minority students is closing, but very slowly. New schools can’t be built fast enough to alleviate overcrowding. A new superintendent was appointed recently to succeed Neil Pedersen, who held the post for 17 years, and change at the top always brings a certain amount of turmoil.

Current board chair Jamezetta Bedford, a CPA who has served on the board since 2003, is running unopposed for a two-year term, so she will remain on the board and provide continuity, among other strengths. But four four-year seats will be on the ballot. Bedford’s four-year seat is open, and the three board members who hold the remaining seats now – Mia Burroughs, Mike Kelley and Annetta Streater – are running for re-election. They will face challengers James Barrett, Kris Castellano and Raymond Conrad. Brian Bower is also running, but admits that his campaign is a stunt to convince the UNC bursar that he is a Chapel Hill resident and should be eligible for in-state tuition.

Look closely at all the candidates, and choose wisely. Your future is at stake.
– Nancy Oates

Mayoral slate

Voters have three choices for mayor in November. Here they are, in alphabetical order:

Watching Mark Kleinschmidt shake off his Gang of Five mentality and open himself to learning from all of his colleagues has been refreshing. He has held a seat on the dais since he was first elected to Town Council in 2001. As a council member, he could be counted on to vote the ruling party line. And that’s how he began his term as mayor. But then he started listening to others on the dais and at the podium share their opinions and expertise. He began to understand finances and economics and how they affected diversity and quality of life. Two years later, he is just as apt to vote with those who favor smart growth and to heed the counsel of staff and advisory boards as he is to support a Brigadoon version of Chapel Hill. He’s even shown the ability to compromise. A lawyer, Kleinschmidt is executive director of Fair Trial Initiative.

The mayoral race marks Tim Sookram‘s inaugural run for political office. A native Texan, he moved to Chapel Hill a year ago. His impetus for joining the race was to spark debate and give voters a choice; until Sookram entered, Kleinschmidt was running unopposed. But Sookram is taking the campaign seriously and brings a newcomer’s perspective to issues of urban development, walkability and smart growth, as well as ideas for boosting the local economy and decreasing government inefficiencies. As an independent web designer, he is used to looking at problems through the eyes of the user to come up with solutions. Sookram is in tune with a segment of Chapel Hill’s economy that is known nationally but rarely mentioned in local political debates: the indy music scene. He plays guitar and sings in the band Gentle Robot.

If the fourth time is to be the charm for Kevin Wolff, he’ll have to overcome some history. When he ran for the first time in 2005, against incumbent Kevin Foy, Wolff garnered 21 percent of the vote without campaigning. In 2007, he put forth effort and won 29 percent of the vote against Foy. In 2009, the year he ran against Kleinschmidt, Matt Czajkowski and Augustus Cho, Wolff ostensibly dropped out of the race after it was too late to remove his name from the ballot, but he did not send a resignation letter to the Orange County Board of Elections. He kept his campaign signs up all over town, and a local newspaper published a letter from Wolff’s wife asking for votes for her husband. Things turned ugly after he was misquoted by The N&O, and he threatened to sue the paper. He received 1 percent of the vote in the election in which Kleinschmidt beat out Czajkowski by less than 1 percent of the vote. Wolff is a patent lawyer in private practice.
– Nancy Oates

Challengers

In alphabetical order, here are the non-incumbents running for Town Council:

Jason Baker brings experience from serving on the town’s Planning Board, the Comprehensive Plan Initiating Committee and the Transportation Board. Previously, he served on the board of the Orange Chatham Sierra Club and was an officer in the Orange County Democratic Party. In 2008, he supported the 0.4 percent land transfer tax property sellers would pay Orange County, a measure that failed at the polls. Expect a polished campaign: Baker handles public relations and outreach for Weaver Street Market. With an undergraduate degree from UNC, he’s now working on a graduate degree in geospatial information science at N.C. State.

Don’t interpret lack of yard signs as tepid support for Augustus Cho; as an environmentalist (and Presbyterian minister, taekwondo instructor and author), he has pledged to forgo the traditional campaign advertising. His focus is on increasing business investments by making Chapel Hill more business-friendly, which should create more jobs and broaden the business revenue tax base, to prevent residential property taxes from rising. Born in Korea, Cho stands to be the first Asian-American elected to Town Council, yet he pledges to make decisions best for the entire town, not pander to special interest groups. He serves on the town Transportation Board and the Community Design Commission and previously on the Northern Area Task Force and the Downtown Parking Commission. Cho’s campaign experience includes a run for mayor of Chapel Hill in 2009 and as a candidate for U.S. representative for District 4.

A transplant from Los Angeles, Laney Dale wants to preserve the small-town atmosphere that drew him east. One of the main planks of his political platform is maintaining proper growth limits for the town. As co-founder and CEO of a technology startup that designs mobile apps, he understands what drives future growth and can plan for the future. He’d like to make Chapel Hill easier to do business in, so as to reduce the tax strain on residential property owners. He serves on the Parks & Recreation Commission and supports the IFC men’s shelter relocating to Homestead Road.

The manager of a Wells Fargo Home Mortgage branch, Jon DeHart understands finances and how to put money to work. He’s lent his expertise to the Community Home Trust Finance Committee, Habitat for Humanity, the Chapel Hill-Carrboro YMCA and various committees at his church. While other teens were being teenagers, DeHart showed himself at a young age to be a leader with the heart of a servant, by earning the rank of Eagle Scout. He’s committed to transparency and restoring public trust in town government. He’s a member of the Transportation Board and belonged to the inaugural class of the town’s Citizens’ Police Academy. He ran for council in 2009.

Carl Schuler’s focus is on growing the local economy. A nurse consultant who runs clinical trials at the UNC Center for Heart & Vascular Care, Schuler has held leadership positions in professional associations and the Vineyard Square Homeowners’ Association. Perhaps because he was born in Canada, he knows something about being a good neighbor; in Chapel Hill he belongs to the Good Neighbor Plan Advisory Committee. He’s also participated in UNC’s employee forum and regularly attends Town Council meetings to observe the action.

Lee Storrow’s passion is affordable housing. (So why he took a stand against Aydan Court, which would have put more than $1 million in the affordable housing coffers, is a story to explore.) In his conversations with people in the community, he’s learned that residents are being squeezed out by the high cost of living in Chapel Hill. He says the town needs to make a commitment to affordable housing to stay a diverse community. A UNC alum, he is managing director of the N.C. Alliance for Health and has done advocacy work on the state and local levels. A volunteer in health-related organizations and a tutor with Orange County Human Services, he also serves on the town’s Comprehensive Plan Initiating Committee.

Correction and apology

In an earlier post I said that Donna Bell had missed more council meetings than anyone on the dais. But I received the official attendance record today from the town, and Gene Pease won the contest by a long shot. Since January 2010, when Pease and Bell joined the council, through June 27 of this year, Pease has missed 13 meetings; Bell has missed only four and left early due to illness on two other meetings.

My sincere apologies to Donna Bell.

And Gene, what’s up, dude?
– Nancy Oates

Incumbents

Let’s dispel rumors right from the get-go: Sally Greene’s decision not to seek a third term on Town Council probably had nothing to do with freeing up her Monday nights to watch “The Bachelor/Bachelorette” series. Rather, Greene said she has accomplished what she set out to do: convening the Orange County Partnership to End Homelessness; voting for the inclusionary zoning ordinance; creating seven Neighborhood Conservation Districts since 2004; and preserving 92 acres of open space under a permanent conservation easement. One memorable moment came recently from her “no way, no how” comment as she argued against an urban archery program to reduce the deer population. The remark was the closest thing to an outburst the otherwise even-keel council member has uttered. We’ve appreciated that over the years she has rid her voice of an early peevish edge, and we wish her well in her future endeavors.

Three incumbents are running.

This will be the first campaign for Donna Bell, whose name was put forth after the 2009 election because incumbent Jim Merritt did not get enough votes to stay on council, and council members wanted a black member. Initially, Bell brought a fresh perspective to council and asked interesting questions. But as time went on, she had less availability and displayed less independent thinking. She has missed more council meetings than anyone on the dais.

Matt Czajkowski has done a yeoman’s job of trying to turn around the Titanic. Before he was elected to his first term in 2007, council votes routinely ran 9-0. After he was elected, we began seeing votes of 8-1 or 7-2, and in recent years, as the town has struggled with the sagging economy, council members are listening to his financial acumen, and some votes have gone 5-4. He has taken common-sense approaches, remained steadfast despite sniping and sarcastic comments from other council members, and urged council members to heed findings and recommendations from the experts on staff and advisory boards. With plenty of hair left to pull out, he’s willing to take on another term.

Jim Ward is seeking his fourth term on council. We’ve watched him become less didactic and more thoughtful in recent years, and we respect his ardent protection of plant life. Not known for rabble-rousing, he nevertheless pushed hard for the county to pony up more money for the library and spoke out against the railroading of two sanitation workers fired after lobbying for a union.
– Nancy Oates

Court goes to the dogs

Government by gut feeling has spread from the Town Council dais to the District Court bench.

Last week Lunsford Long, the newest District Court judge in North Carolina’s District 15-B, covering Orange and Chatham counties, presided over a case in which a pet owner sued Orange County to exempt her dog from a state-mandated six-month quarantine while he (the dog) was observed for rabies. The dog was several months overdue for a rabies shot and was found in close proximity to a rabid raccoon. The dog was sent to a veterinary clinic where he was housed while being observed for signs of rabies. The pet owner was liable for the $4,000 veterinary bill.

But after four of the six months, the pet owner missed her dog and projected her feelings onto her pet, saying the dog missed her and thus was being harmed by the state law designed to protect people and other animals from the spread of rabies. Long heard the case and, presumably finding no legal precedent to exempt the dog from state law, adjourned the case until July 25, when Orange County’s health director could weigh in. “Dogs are people, too,” Long said.

The prospect of a lonely dog receiving good care in an air-conditioned clinic tugged at Long’s heartstrings, and the next day he called the pet owner’s lawyer and said, despite state law and the safety of the public, he would order the dog to be released before it had been cleared of being a rabies threat.

The irony is that for decades Long was a divorce lawyer in town with a reputation for delaying and dragging out custody cases and fomenting rancor among parents, despite the harm that came to children in limbo or being used as pawns. In Long’s eyes, apparently dogs are people, but children aren’t.

Long was appointed by Gov. Perdue to fill the unexpired term of Alonzo Coleman, after previous unsuccessful attempts to gain a seat on the bench and against the better judgment of his peers. Coleman was elected in 2008 but had to step down six months later after reaching the mandatory retirement age of 72. Long will be up for election in 2012.

Any bets on whether the pet owner will return to court to sue for relief of the vet bill?
– Nancy Oates

Condo giveaways

You can tell that the real estate market has tipped from a buyer’s market to a seller’s once builders and developers begin to give gifts to buyers who close on one of their homes. The last time the real estate market edged away from the seller’s end of the spectrum, and builders were looking at an overly ambitious inventory of big, expensive homes, the gifts got ever more lavish. One developer promised a John Deere lawn tractor to those who closed on any home in his upscale subdivision. As if anyone buying in that nearly million-dollar price range would mow their own lawn.

The folks at 140 West Franklin haven’t gotten to the stage of giving away tractors – or whatever the urban equivalent would be – but they are dangling the chance of a freebee for those who come to the sales office to look. This weekend, from noon to 5 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday, you can go to the sales office at 126 W. Franklin St. and, after looking at the floor plans and finishes, register for a drawing to win one of three gift certificates from local vendors: $150 for Lantern; $100 for A Southern Season; or $50 for The Meat House.

Sales of condos have been slow during the down real estate market of recent years. Partly it’s a function of a Catch 22 – people are reticent to buy unless the building is at least half sold, but the building won’t fill up unless the people start to buy. Hue and the Quorum Center in downtown Raleigh, not to mention Greenbridge on the Chapel Hill/Carrboro line, surely must have given 140 West Franklin’s owners, Ram Development, pause.

But I predict that, in time, condos in Chapel Hill will sell. Aging baby boomers want to downsize to lower-maintenance living than a house and a yard can provide. Two-income-earner families will seek out more secure, low-maintenance homes close to the activity downtown. And with the limits Town Council seems inclined to put on development, living quarters will be harder to come by within town borders. Limiting supply as demand increases will push up the price of residential real estate.

Condo downsides include a monthly maintenance fee on top of your mortgage, and the fact that all condo owners in a building have to split the cost of any additional repairs and maintenance to the building as a whole.

But don’t take my word for it. Hear it from the sales agents for 140 West Franklin when you stop by to enter the drawing. Unless, of course, you’re too busy mowing your lawn.
– Nancy Oates

Know where your name goes

A well-designed website can give a veneer of legitimacy to any venture. Just ask the visitors to a sham website that looked convincingly like a site to buy DPAC tickets. Buyers who purchased tickets through the sham site paid more than double the price they would have paid on the official DPAC site.

A website for Friends of Chapel Hill, though not set up to collect money, raises some red flags as well. It claims to be a nonprofit, though its name is not found on the registry of legitimate charities. It gives no indication of the founders or members of the group. And the email address used as its contact method may be unmonitored.

The site has names of what it claims are Chapel Hill residents who signed a petition opposing Aydan Court. The petition caught my attention when I noticed it listed the names of teenagers not old enough to vote; family members listed individually, including children; at least one Realtor, and real estate professionals usually are in favor of smart growth; and people who have not previously come out passionately against growth. So I called some of the people I know whose names appeared on the petition.

One person claimed never to have signed a petition against Aydan Court. Another asked, “What’s Aydan Court?” Apparently people stood outside the library one Saturday asking library users to sign a petition to save the environment that would be sent to Town Council members. One person who initially declined to sign the petition as she did not live within the Chapel Hill voting district was urged to sign it anyway, and she did. Who doesn’t want to save the environment?

But my email to find out more about the group has gone unanswered. And the person who does not want to be listed on a petition against Aydan Court has no recourse for getting her name removed.

Friends of Chapel Hill has put forth candidate Lee Storrow for Town Council. I wonder whether he knows that.

With friends like this … best to verify.
– Nancy Oates

Who controls the condo market?

Whenever a development that includes residential condos comes before Town Council, count on a small but vocal contingent to object to condos being included in the affordable housing mix. Families with children want single-family detached houses surrounded by lawn, this group claims. Adding one- and two-bedroom condos to the workforce housing pool amounts to substandard options, this group implies.

But the market begs to differ, and data from the most recent U.S. Census shows why.

In applying for a special use permit to build East 54, Roger Perry doubled the number of affordable units town ordinance requires. Those 34 affordable units sold in short order. Sales of market-rate condos in Greenbridge were slow, but all 14 of the affordable units sold quickly.

The 2010 Census reveals that married couples with children, a category making up 75 percent of total households in 1960, dropped to 48 percent in 2010. Family households (which the Census Bureau defines as the householder and one or more people related to the householder) increased by a factor of 1.7 in the past 50 years, from 45.1 million to 77.5 million. In that same period, non-family households (defined as people living alone or with no members related to the householder) grew fivefold, from 7.9 million to 39.2 million.

Real estate professionals note that while family householders look for homes with four or more bedrooms, non-family householders want three bedrooms or fewer. Though family householders are likely choose home size over location, non-family householders value location more than size. Non-family householders want to live close to work, entertainment and transportation.

Banks, on the other hand, don’t like condos, thus their requirement that at least half of the units in a condo project be presold before the construction loan will be approved. Banks have stricter requirements for condo unit buyers, too. Before approving a mortgage for an individual unit, banks want to see 70 percent of the units sold (up from 50 percent not long ago) and no more than half of the sold units belonging to investors. FHA loans require that 90 percent of the units be sold. And mortgage rates for condos are often higher than for single-family detached homes.

Perhaps people who have never lived in multifamily housing can’t imagine a satisfying life without yard work, but millions of people in cities across the country can list the benefits of condo living, such as better security, lower maintenance and more convenient location.

But in Chapel Hill, the majority of the Town Council is enamored of single-family detached houses and is using its veto power to limit housing choices for the rest of us.
– Nancy Oates