You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Money talks”.
Money talks
by Nancy Oates on July 7, 2014
• Permalink
Tagged 523 E. Franklin
Posted by Nancy Oates on July 7, 2014
http://chapelhillwatch.com/2014/07/07/money-talks/
Previous Post
A peek behind the curtain
A peek behind the curtain
Next Post
Weekly’s end
Weekly’s end
Recent Comments
- Nancy Oates on We’re still here
- Deborah Fulghieri on We’re still here
- Pluramus on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- Plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
- Plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
Blogroll
Categories
- 140 West
- Budget
- Business
- Carolina North
- CH2020
- Committees
- Community life
- Council Members
- County business
- Courts
- Courtyards of Homestead
- COVID-19
- Deer
- Downtown Chapel Hill
- Economic development
- Elections
- Environment
- Ethics
- Food Trucks
- Homeless Shelter
- Housing
- Land Use
- Library
- Lifestyle
- Media
- Museum
- Northside
- Occupy Protests
- Parking
- Police
- Politics
- Public Works
- Roads
- Sanitation workers
- Schools
- Social justice
- Spending
- Taxes
- Technology
- Town staff
- Transportation
- Trees
- UNC
- Uncategorized
- Work and Money
Tag Cloud
123 West Franklin advisory boards affordability American Legion annexation Bicycle Apartments bond referendum BRT Bus ads candidates Carolina Flats cell phones Central West CH2020 Charterwood Community Home Trust comprehensive plan county commissioners county government development Ephesus-Fordham fireworks form-based zoning Franklin Street Friends of Downtown Growth health care Historic District Commission historic districts Holidays Light Rail Obey Creek park-and-ride personalities real estate sales Rogers Road Shortbread Silent Sam students The Edge Timber Hollow towing traffic Trinitas VOEMeta
Fred Black
/ July 7, 2014The deal from the UNC Arts and Sciences Foundation includes a one-time payment of $475,000 to the town instead of paying annual property taxes.
Do you really believe that individual campaign donations drive the decisions made by Council members?
Nancy
/ July 7, 2014Fred — I believe Matt Czajkowski is the only council member willing to push back and negotiate the best deal for the town against wealthy neighbors, developers and the university who aggressively lobby for their own interests. And he appears to be the only council member with the fortitude to continue to stand up for the best interests of the community, even when it makes people used to getting their way mad at him.
Fred Black
/ July 7, 2014Thanks Nancy, but that wasn’t the question! Hmmm, how again did he vote?
many
/ July 7, 2014Let’s see; if $1.25 million equals a 1 penny tax unit then $425,000 is about one third of a penny. So not only did Chapel Hill forego $550,000 dollars on the price (a sum on third greater than the one-time-tax payment), but the town also agreed to forgo taxing the property in perpetuity. Nice.
…..and the reasoning was? I am still flabbergasted by the lack of discussion. Really folks, shouldn’t the town leadership and financial staff have to “show their work” when they make decision like this?
I did not even get the impression the issue was town vs. wealthy neighbors.
No doubt that the University will do a good job with the property and that it is a reasonable (probably not the best) use of the property. However, the University gets what ever the University wants in Chapel Hill regardless of the circumstances.
Those connected with the University have a greater influence over what happens in Chapel Hill than the rest of us and this juggernaut long ago got past.point where people even have to explain their reasoning.
How does that economic development thing work again?
many
/ July 7, 2014Correction: the 550K is equivalent to a one cent tax increase. Even worse.
Don Evans
/ July 7, 2014Donna Bell didn’t even want to talk about it? Worst. Council. Member. Ever.?
Bruce Springsteen
/ July 8, 2014http://www.carrborocitizen.com/main/2009/07/30/bill-strom-resigns-from-town-council/
I especially like the implication that the resignation might be because of an ambition to run for Mayor. His house in CH had sold weeks before and he was only a few days from closing on a a condo in Manhattan.
many
/ July 8, 2014Right. Like action figures, each one sold separately.
The point is that we’ll never know. There might have been good reason to make the choice they did, or perhaps it is true indifference to other pressing problems.
Meanwhile; NC Leg is cutting funding to schools, Chapel Hill is rushing projects in the name of economic development and there are many other pressing capital expenditures.
That is why the decision makes no sense to me.
Ex animo.
Del Snow
/ July 8, 2014I can sympathize with possibly being burnt out from sitting on Council, but wouldn’t the ethical reaction be for Donna to resign?
Fred Black
/ July 8, 2014From the WCHL story:
It seemed that everyone who squeezed into tiny Meeting Room C of the Chapel Hill Public Library on Wednesday evening had already spoken their minds about the sale of the old public library, a little more than one-and-a-half miles away on East Franklin Street.
“Is there anyone here today,” asked Chapel Hill Mayor Mark Kleinschmidt, “who wasn’t able to provide comments, orally, to the council at a previous meeting on this issue, who would like to speak today?”
That was followed several seconds of silence.
“Well, thank you very much,” the Mayor concluded, to laughter all around.
Fred Black
/ July 8, 2014Bell resign? What is the ethical problem Del?
DOM
/ July 8, 2014Del Snow –
“…wouldn’t the ethical reaction be for Donna to resign?”
Rather ironic coming from someone whom many recommended resigning after her seemingly biased and conflictive behavior while serving as Chair of the Planning Board — and who chose to be a party in the lawsuit against the town after the Charterwood development had been approved in her neighborhood. How many thousands of dollars did that fiasco cost us, the taxpayers?
Don Evans
/ July 8, 2014Fred
Ethical problem? Really? Bell doesn’t want to listen to residents when her job is to listen to residents. I’d say it’s a big ethical problem when she sits on the board and doesn’t want to do the work.
DOM
You got a nerve chucking the bias and conflictive labels. The Central-West boondoggle and the wasted tax dollars meant nothing to you? Oh, I forgot, you had a dog in that fight, didn’t you?
Fred Black
/ July 8, 2014Don, which residents didn’t she want to listen to? Were you there that evening? What am I missing, given the mayor indicated that no one asked to speak.
Nancy
/ July 8, 2014Fred — I was there. When Matt Czajkowski questioned PNC’s $40K bump in commission, Donna Bell jumped in and said, essentially, Let’s vote first and see whether anyone else objects, and if not, there’s no need for a discussion. So Mark Kleinschmidt did a straw poll, and it was not 8-1, so he allowed discussion to proceed. Then after Lee Storrow said who he supported and why prior to the vote on whom to sell to, Donna said she’d vote with the majority. She said a bit more than that, but she was speaking very softly and neither I nor the people around me caught all that she said, other than she would cast her vote with the majority.
Certainly council has been known to talk a thing to death, but I prefer that rather than quick decisions that leave taxpayers wondering whether council has the community’s best interests at heart.
Fred Black
/ July 8, 2014Nancy, so how is that not listening to residents? Were these not the mayor and council members? So again, why is this cause to resign?
many
/ July 8, 2014The job is not just simply “listening to residents”, and you know that is true Mr. Black.
The job is making informed decisions that are in the interests of the community at large and communicating those decisions.
Both entail detailing the process of critical thinking behind decisions, however unpopular that reasoning is, not just shutting down conversation and calling for a vote.
What transpired at that meeting was very poor example of representative government. The Chapel Hill city council and hizhonor should be ashamed, not by their decision as much as their cowardice.
Ph. Sledge
/ July 9, 2014It is no surprise to me that Matt was the only council member who made any attempt at fiscal responsibility. When the museum was forced to close because it could no longer afford to maintain the town’s problem ridden structure and could no longer find private donors to fund the repair of crushed heat vents that has been taking on ground water since 2000, et al, Matt was the only councilmember who regularly met with the Museum community. He actually took the Museum’s quarterly measurable standard reports seriously. They detailed over six years of carefully documented issues with the building—making it abundantly clear to Roger and his merry men that what had been a town asset and a property of historical pride was sliding precariously into what would ultimately be a huge fiscal loss to the town’s coffers. Neglect of their own property and the cries for help that fell on deaf ears lost the building and the sizeable revenue it could have provided had it been maintained. Just as a reminder…when the museum’s board let council know that it was costing thousands of dollars per month to keep the lights and heat on Donna Bell snidely suggested they have a bake sale.