You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Torches waiting to be lit”.
Torches waiting to be lit
Posted by Nancy Oates on June 6, 2012
http://chapelhillwatch.com/2012/06/06/torches-waiting-to-be-lit/
Previous Post
Signs of ill will
Signs of ill will
Next Post
Respect for good neighbors
Respect for good neighbors
Recent Comments
- Nancy Oates on We’re still here
- Deborah Fulghieri on We’re still here
- Pluramus on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- Plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
- Plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
Blogroll
Categories
- 140 West
- Budget
- Business
- Carolina North
- CH2020
- Committees
- Community life
- Council Members
- County business
- Courts
- Courtyards of Homestead
- COVID-19
- Deer
- Downtown Chapel Hill
- Economic development
- Elections
- Environment
- Ethics
- Food Trucks
- Homeless Shelter
- Housing
- Land Use
- Library
- Lifestyle
- Media
- Museum
- Northside
- Occupy Protests
- Parking
- Police
- Politics
- Public Works
- Roads
- Sanitation workers
- Schools
- Social justice
- Spending
- Taxes
- Technology
- Town staff
- Transportation
- Trees
- UNC
- Uncategorized
- Work and Money
Tag Cloud
123 West Franklin advisory boards affordability American Legion annexation Bicycle Apartments bond referendum BRT Bus ads candidates Carolina Flats cell phones Central West CH2020 Charterwood Community Home Trust comprehensive plan county commissioners county government development Ephesus-Fordham fireworks form-based zoning Franklin Street Friends of Downtown Growth health care Historic District Commission historic districts Holidays Light Rail Obey Creek park-and-ride personalities real estate sales Rogers Road Shortbread Silent Sam students The Edge Timber Hollow towing traffic Trinitas VOEMeta

PhSledge
/ June 6, 2012We’ve battled Duke on this issue for years. At one point they issued “No spraying” signs for those of us on an easement that was doused with herbicides periodically. (no trees, just undergrowth and low bushes–but spray they did) We could never find one person at Duke to talk to about this, but rather would have to wait for their work crews to appear and stop them from destroying our fruit trees and blueberry bushes. They assured us they sprayed annually but we had lived at that address for seven years when they first showed up…wanting to keep those pesticides from our own organic garden that borders the property was a puzzlement to Duke–a concept that literally had them scratching their heads.
Anita Badrock
/ June 6, 2012Thank you Town Council for spending time on this issue. This is the kind of work we need from local government. I’ve lived on a power easement for years, fortunately not one with lots of vegetation. Even so, when they do come through and trim and such, the debris they leave behind is significant. Aren’t Developers in this town required to properly dispose of vegetation they cut or dig up? If so, why does Duke Energy get a pass?
Mark Marcoplos
/ June 7, 2012Maybe the Chamber of Commerce should step in here. After all, Duke Energy is a member.
Fred Black
/ June 7, 2012“Step in” and do what Mark?
Kimberly Willardson
/ June 7, 2012Thank you Town Council for your attention to this issue. There’s a major disconnect between Duke Energy’s power line maintenance policies and what questions/complaints Duke Energy will address concerning their power line maintenance policies. My husband and I are still waiting for a response to a complaint we filed with Duke Energy more than a year and a half ago about their power line “maintenance” on our property. It’s almost beyond belief that a public utility company has so much control over the health, appearance, and value of our natural environment without being held accountable for the consequences of that control.
Mark Marcoplos
/ June 7, 2012Request that they act responsibly toward the community as long as they want to influence the local economy to benefit them.
Fred Black
/ June 7, 2012Oh how easy it would be to solve our issues if everyone agreed on what those words mean!
Ed Harrison
/ June 8, 2012Nancy, note that I suggested that, with all the gadgets in the world, Duke Energy could certainly come up with something that didn’t involve spraying or painting. My suggestion was a form of “drip applicator,” which is used for many other substances. I help manage a NC Botanical Garden natural area in company with one of Jim Ward’s colleague Associate Directors, Dr. Johnny Randall Consequently I’ve gotten updated into the 21st century on responsible and necessary use of herbicides. The Bot Garden uses them a lot in the right places, and I use them around my own yard for a similar reason to that of Duke Energy, to remove trees that are interfering with other plant growth. (Never anything that requires anymore than a small handsaw). Anyway, the rigidity and lack of imagination of the Duke Energy staff was striking. Our staff conveyed later in the week to me that the power company folks were stunned at the encounter with our Council. It looks to me from this column that we were reflecting our community’s views. I definitely prefer electricity to not having it, but there is clearly more than one way to kill a tree.
Road Warrior
/ June 9, 2012Ed,
I feel for you and Council. It is really hard when you discover first hand just how single-minded people can be or just plain unimaginative.
Power companies are State-Granted Monopolies designed to make money for shareholders on the backs of the Public. They don’t have to listen, because what are you really going to do? You cannot legally do much of anything. The type of people who are part of this type of organization usually aren’t what one would consider free-thinkers.
It’s been Quixotic to challenge them. I would say it is Tilting at Windmills, but that would assume the people running Duke Power would put them up in the first place.
Mark Marcoplos
/ June 9, 2012Road Warrior – a masterful post.
John Kramer
/ June 10, 2012Oh well, everyone posting on this site is no doubt (ok mostly – except for you extreme finance challenged eco types) powering their internet connection via Duke Energy and complaining about uhhhh oh yeah, Duke Energy.
Yep, those evil people who poison your trees and shrubs. And keep the 115,000 volt power lines safe from mother nature when the wind howls etc etc.
So for all you wannabe haters out there- here is my advice- shut off your electricity in protest.
Otherwise, until you have a decent understanding of ALL of that which is needed (including cutting down your precious trees and keeping more from growing) I would suggest that you refrain from criticizing the company that provides you with some of the most cost effective energy in the US,
Certainly, folks, cutting down trees is part of why they are so good at keeping the lights on!
Joe Capowski
/ June 10, 2012Dealing with Duke on this issue is like going to the doctor’s, as follows:
Joe: Doc, my elbow hurts.
Doc: We can amputate your arm. Would you like us to do that?
Joe: Amputate my arm? Of course not.
Doc: Then don’t complain; we offered you the treatment and you refused.
John Kramer
/ June 10, 2012How clever Mr Capowski, do you charge the batteries on your truck with Duke Power? If so, maybe you should get some solar collectors instead.
It is so easy for those with no real knowledge to criticize,
Road Warrior
/ June 11, 2012John:
You aren’t paying attention. We would prefer they cut them down to poisoning them. Perhaps, you should try reading?
Just a suggestion.
Also, if you lived through the Ice Storm, they aren’t that good. You’re an ideologue.
They should take their cash and bury the power lines. That’s what a good power company does.