You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Back from break”.
Back from break
by Nancy Oates on April 16, 2012
• Permalink
Posted by Nancy Oates on April 16, 2012
http://chapelhillwatch.com/2012/04/16/back-from-break/
Previous Post
Keeping up with campus
Keeping up with campus
Next Post
Windfall
Windfall
Recent Comments
- Nancy Oates on We’re still here
- Deborah Fulghieri on We’re still here
- Pluramus on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- Plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
- Plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
Blogroll
Categories
- 140 West
- Budget
- Business
- Carolina North
- CH2020
- Committees
- Community life
- Council Members
- County business
- Courts
- Courtyards of Homestead
- COVID-19
- Deer
- Downtown Chapel Hill
- Economic development
- Elections
- Environment
- Ethics
- Food Trucks
- Homeless Shelter
- Housing
- Land Use
- Library
- Lifestyle
- Media
- Museum
- Northside
- Occupy Protests
- Parking
- Police
- Politics
- Public Works
- Roads
- Sanitation workers
- Schools
- Social justice
- Spending
- Taxes
- Technology
- Town staff
- Transportation
- Trees
- UNC
- Uncategorized
- Work and Money
Tag Cloud
123 West Franklin advisory boards affordability American Legion annexation Bicycle Apartments bond referendum BRT Bus ads candidates Carolina Flats cell phones Central West CH2020 Charterwood Community Home Trust comprehensive plan county commissioners county government development Ephesus-Fordham fireworks form-based zoning Franklin Street Friends of Downtown Growth health care Historic District Commission historic districts Holidays Light Rail Obey Creek park-and-ride personalities real estate sales Rogers Road Shortbread Silent Sam students The Edge Timber Hollow towing traffic Trinitas VOEMeta
George C
/ April 16, 2012I would be interested in learning whether anyone thinks this complex should not be annexed into the Town of Chapel Hill and, if so, why.
Scott
/ April 16, 2012There should be no controversy about annexing this development. It was developed meeting the LUMO standards and the comprehensive plan and has been built to all public road, water, sewer, open space standards. It is virtually in the commuter parking lot for those residents that would live, work, and play in Chapel Hill. Residents will use the transit system regularly. This is a very good example of medium density development at the corners of the Town that will support existing retail areas and transit.