You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Train wreck”.
Train wreck
by Nancy Oates on January 31, 2012
• Permalink
Posted in Economic development, Housing
Tagged Charterwood
Posted by Nancy Oates on January 31, 2012
http://chapelhillwatch.com/2012/01/31/train-wreck/
Previous Post
Food for thought
Food for thought
Next Post
Roger’s job gets tougher
Roger’s job gets tougher
Recent Comments
- Nancy Oates on We’re still here
- Deborah Fulghieri on We’re still here
- Pluramus on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- Plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
- Plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
Blogroll
Categories
- 140 West
- Budget
- Business
- Carolina North
- CH2020
- Committees
- Community life
- Council Members
- County business
- Courts
- Courtyards of Homestead
- COVID-19
- Deer
- Downtown Chapel Hill
- Economic development
- Elections
- Environment
- Ethics
- Food Trucks
- Homeless Shelter
- Housing
- Land Use
- Library
- Lifestyle
- Media
- Museum
- Northside
- Occupy Protests
- Parking
- Police
- Politics
- Public Works
- Roads
- Sanitation workers
- Schools
- Social justice
- Spending
- Taxes
- Technology
- Town staff
- Transportation
- Trees
- UNC
- Uncategorized
- Work and Money
Tag Cloud
123 West Franklin advisory boards affordability American Legion annexation Bicycle Apartments bond referendum BRT Bus ads candidates Carolina Flats cell phones Central West CH2020 Charterwood Community Home Trust comprehensive plan county commissioners county government development Ephesus-Fordham fireworks form-based zoning Franklin Street Friends of Downtown Growth health care Historic District Commission historic districts Holidays Light Rail Obey Creek park-and-ride personalities real estate sales Rogers Road Shortbread Silent Sam students The Edge Timber Hollow towing traffic Trinitas VOEMeta

Jon DeHart
/ January 31, 2012Nancy,
That is a good question . I hope everyone is looking forward to higher taxes …
Mark Marcoplos
/ January 31, 2012Reminds me of the last Town Council campaign when Matt Cz made criticism of a half-built East 54 project a major issue, despite many, many months of public discussion to build just such a project.
DOM
/ January 31, 2012My God, is there NO WAY a developer can work with the whims and fancies of local politicians and special interest groups that mask themselves as concerned citizens?
Mr. Christian spent a million dollars trying to placate a council that seemed encouraging through almost the entire process (I know, I attended every meeting). In the end, the council members speak with so many mixed messages, everything just becomes incomprehensible and meaningless.
I fear all the hoopla around a 2020 comprehensive plan will just devolve into more of the same: A small minority of screamers screaming loudest that always ends up being the only sound heard by a whimsically inept and narrow-minded town council.
Let’s face it, neither the local taxpaying public, nor a local developer, stands a chance in this environment.
Joe
/ January 31, 2012I don’t understand. The Town keeps talking about wanting to encourage business activity and growing the tax base and not being perceived as “anti-business”, yet they do this kind of stuff?
Oh, and people who live in the city limits complaining about college students should simply be ignored. I have zero sympathy from people who benefit mightily from the University and all that it entails, yet complain about the students. These are the same people who’d move to the coast and then complain about the ocean being too wet.