You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “IFC SUP, Part I”.
IFC SUP, Part I
by Nancy Oates on March 22, 2011
• Permalink
Posted in Homeless Shelter
Posted by Nancy Oates on March 22, 2011
http://chapelhillwatch.com/2011/03/22/ifc-sup-part-i/
Previous Post
Working out the IFC SUP
Working out the IFC SUP
Next Post
In defense of churches
In defense of churches
Recent Comments
- Nancy Oates on We’re still here
- Deborah Fulghieri on We’re still here
- Pluramus on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- Plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
- Plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
- Nancy Oates on Greene Tract series continues
- plurimus on Greene Tract series continues
Blogroll
Categories
- 140 West
- Budget
- Business
- Carolina North
- CH2020
- Committees
- Community life
- Council Members
- County business
- Courts
- Courtyards of Homestead
- COVID-19
- Deer
- Downtown Chapel Hill
- Economic development
- Elections
- Environment
- Ethics
- Food Trucks
- Homeless Shelter
- Housing
- Land Use
- Library
- Lifestyle
- Media
- Museum
- Northside
- Occupy Protests
- Parking
- Police
- Politics
- Public Works
- Roads
- Sanitation workers
- Schools
- Social justice
- Spending
- Taxes
- Technology
- Town staff
- Transportation
- Trees
- UNC
- Uncategorized
- Work and Money
Tag Cloud
123 West Franklin advisory boards affordability American Legion annexation Bicycle Apartments bond referendum BRT Bus ads candidates Carolina Flats cell phones Central West CH2020 Charterwood Community Home Trust comprehensive plan county commissioners county government development Ephesus-Fordham fireworks form-based zoning Franklin Street Friends of Downtown Growth health care Historic District Commission historic districts Holidays Light Rail Obey Creek park-and-ride personalities real estate sales Rogers Road Shortbread Silent Sam students The Edge Timber Hollow towing traffic Trinitas VOEMeta

George C
/ March 22, 2011Nancy,
It was Phil Mason, not Phil Post, who presented the project for the Town staff.
Jon DeHart
/ March 22, 2011Long night… I was there from 6:30 until 11:30 or so .
I Was happy to see civil discourse among all present . Thanks to everyone for being good neighbors and being respectful .
Quick fact check. I heard Chris Moran say that over 20 % of Orange was below the poverty line. That sounded really high to me . So, I checked the Official US census website. It says Orange County’s rate is 13.9 and the rate for NC is 14.6 .
Link : http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/37/37135.html
I would also like to see data from the Orange County Sheriff’s department listing the addresses current and previous for the last several years for our regsitered sex offenders .
Nancy Oates
/ March 22, 2011Oops, you’re right, George C. Blame it on the lateness of the hour. I’ll go back in and correct it.
George C
/ March 22, 2011Jon,
The figures you gave the link to are from 2008. Given the worsening of the economy since 2008 it is possible that the figure is closer to 20% now. I’ve heard Chris on other occasions use a figure of 18% and I don’t recall whether he said over or under 20% in his presentation last evening. In any case I wouldn’t be surprised if it was closer to 20% than 15%.
Runner
/ March 22, 2011So, the IFC has held countless meetings with local churches to rally support for its new shelter, but none of these churches have stepped up to offer to handle one single person during white flag nights?
I’m not putting the burnden completely on our churches, but if just 5 churches in Orange County offered to provide 4 emergency cots each during white flag nights, then our community would actually increase its projected emergency homeless supporting capabilities by almost 20%.
The new Community House won’t be built in a week, month or even a year. The various leaders of our community have more than enough time to create an alternative capacity for white flag night support within Orange County.
Runner
/ March 22, 2011I wish there was an edit button here. I meant to say that if 5 organizations, not churches. Oh, and I would have corrected my spelling of the word burden.
John Kramer
/ March 22, 2011Orange county is handling this just like they did the landfill. How shocking.
Jon DeHart
/ March 22, 2011@George,
Either way it is a lot … I agree we need to help folks in these difficult times .
Problem is , one has to know where one is, to know where one is going . We have to start from good data to make our plan .
Would be glad to sit down with you or Chris and review . My guess is the current number is around 15-16 % . With our population being around 130 k for Orange County . A data error of 4-5 % means 5,200-7,800 people . With an average household size of of 2.3 . That is 2300-3,200 households . That is a big difference .
Using Chris’s data, that means we have 10,000 households in Orange County at or below the poverty level . Seems high to me .
I am in 100 % agreement that we need a good plan to help those in need . To have that good plan , we must start with good data .
Signing off from blogging, back to work for the day …
Terri Buckner
/ March 22, 2011The Chapel Hill News reported the Orange County poverty rate at 18% based on 2010 data. The most recent figure I could find was 16%. Considering that the homeless are rarely captured in census data, it’s a fairly staggering figure either way.
Mark Peters
/ March 22, 2011Same article: “The Orange County numbers may be skewed by college students, said Nancy Coston, the director of the Orange County Department of Social Services.”
http://www.chapelhillnews.com/2010/10/06/59935/orange-county-poverty-rate-rising.html
Mark Peters
/ March 22, 2011We would love for Aaron Nelson to come back and talk longer next time. He does a wonderful job articulating why the shelter is being moved out of downtown and I don’t think he even realizes it.
Fred Black
/ March 22, 2011I hope Mark that you are able to distance your cause from the uninformed “noise.”
John Kramer
/ March 22, 2011Thanks, Fred for proving my point.
Runner
/ March 22, 2011Mr. Kramer,
I merely request that you present your arguments without resorting to labeling others with symplistic generalizations.
John Kramer
/ March 23, 2011Well, okay then. I think it is a bad idea to do what the IFC is proposing, generalize that!